↓ Skip to main content

Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
50 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
517 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Wood, Alice Harsant, Martin Dallimer, Anna Cronin de Chavez, Rosemary R. C. McEachan, Christopher Hassall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 517 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 14%
Researcher 63 12%
Student > Bachelor 60 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 70 14%
Unknown 147 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 98 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 12%
Social Sciences 40 8%
Psychology 35 7%
Design 17 3%
Other 90 17%
Unknown 175 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#215,052
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#464
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,383
of 453,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#14
of 789 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 789 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.