↓ Skip to main content

Cross-Domain Association in Metacognitive Efficiency Depends on First-Order Task Types

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-Domain Association in Metacognitive Efficiency Depends on First-Order Task Types
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02464
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan L. F. Lee, Eugene Ruby, Nathan Giles, Hakwan Lau

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 37%
Student > Master 9 18%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 43%
Neuroscience 14 27%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,034,580
of 25,026,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,138
of 33,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,697
of 448,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#253
of 791 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,026,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 791 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.