↓ Skip to main content

How and Why Do Students Use Learning Strategies? A Mixed Methods Study on Learning Strategies and Desirable Difficulties With Effective Strategy Users

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How and Why Do Students Use Learning Strategies? A Mixed Methods Study on Learning Strategies and Desirable Difficulties With Effective Strategy Users
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanne F. E. Rovers, Renée E. Stalmeijer, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, Hans H. C. M. Savelberg, Anique B. H. de Bruin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Master 12 7%
Lecturer 10 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 73 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 18%
Social Sciences 26 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 76 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,690,349
of 25,054,308 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,874
of 33,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,616
of 448,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#219
of 772 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,054,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 772 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.