The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the Effects of Metalinguistic and Working Memory Training on Reading Fluency in Chinese and English: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02510 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tik-Sze Carrey Siu, Catherine McBride, Chi-Shing Tse, Xiuhong Tong, Urs Maurer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,148,538
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#14,404
of 30,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,873
of 436,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#403
of 778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.