↓ Skip to main content

Interpersonal Coordination in Soccer: Interpreting Literature to Enhance the Representativeness of Task Design, From Dyads to Teams

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interpersonal Coordination in Soccer: Interpreting Literature to Enhance the Representativeness of Task Design, From Dyads to Teams
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02550
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo Santos, Ricardo Duarte, Keith Davids, Israel Teoldo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 4 6%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 30 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Decision Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,602,842
of 25,930,027 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,165
of 34,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,221
of 447,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#159
of 778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.