The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Impact of Prior Trial Experience on Mock Jurors’ Note Taking During Trials and Recall of Trial Evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00047 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joanna Lorek, Luna C. M. Centifanti, Minna Lyons, Craig Thorley |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
India | 1 | 13% |
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 33% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 3 | 25% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,248,454
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,002
of 30,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,989
of 437,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#285
of 776 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 776 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.