The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Limitations of Being a Copycat: Learning Golf Putting Through Auditory and Visual Guidance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00092 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta M. N. Bieńkiewicz, Lionel Bringoux, Franck Buloup, Matthew Rodger, Cathy Craig, Christophe Bourdin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| France | 2 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Israel | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,287,826
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,286
of 34,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,638
of 449,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#197
of 752 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 752 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.