The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Double Trouble: How Being Outnumbered and Negatively Stereotyped Threatens Career Outcomes of Women in STEM
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth van Veelen, Belle Derks, Maaike Dorine Endedijk |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 6 | 13% |
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 55% |
| Scientists | 18 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 234 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 93 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 41 | 18% |
| Psychology | 38 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 101 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,259,662
of 26,480,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,664
of 35,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,240
of 369,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#93
of 884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,480,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.