↓ Skip to main content

Universality vs. Cultural Specificity in the Relations Among Emotional Contagion, Emotion Regulation, and Mood State: An Emotion Process Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Universality vs. Cultural Specificity in the Relations Among Emotional Contagion, Emotion Regulation, and Mood State: An Emotion Process Perspective
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beibei Kuang, Shenli Peng, Xiaochun Xie, Ping Hu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 17 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 29%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,587,228
of 24,406,515 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#20,459
of 32,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,073
of 455,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#576
of 840 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,406,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 840 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.