↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
152 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
394 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Goreis, Martin Voracek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 394 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 394 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 18%
Student > Master 37 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Researcher 33 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 63 16%
Unknown 140 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 149 38%
Social Sciences 34 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 2%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 36 9%
Unknown 146 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 275. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2024.
All research outputs
#136,577
of 26,220,821 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#282
of 35,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,904
of 460,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#13
of 814 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,220,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 814 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.