↓ Skip to main content

Why People Harm the Environment Although They Try to Treat It Well: An Evolutionary-Cognitive Perspective on Climate Compensation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
118 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why People Harm the Environment Although They Try to Treat It Well: An Evolutionary-Cognitive Perspective on Climate Compensation
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00348
Pubmed ID
URN
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-29225
Authors

Patrik Sörqvist, Linda Langeborg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 262 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 93 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 13%
Environmental Science 20 8%
Social Sciences 20 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 4%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 114 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 298. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#121,915
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#252
of 35,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,502
of 370,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#14
of 811 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 811 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.