The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Applying Item Response Theory (IRT) Modeling to an Observational Measure of Childhood Pragmatics: The Pragmatics Observational Measure-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00408 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reinie Cordier, Natalie Munro, Sarah Wilkes-Gillan, Renée Speyer, Lauren Parsons, Annette Joosten |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,456,403
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,048
of 34,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,530
of 369,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#369
of 821 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 821 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.