The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Advancing Methods for Psychological Assessment Across Borders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00503 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai Ruggeri, Lana Bojanić, Lindsey van Bokhorst, Hannes Jarke, Silvana Mareva, Olatz Ojinaga-Alfageme, David T. Mellor, Sam Norton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 57% |
| Scientists | 15 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 37% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,463,088
of 26,461,995 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,075
of 35,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,377
of 367,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#113
of 780 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,461,995 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 780 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.