You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
No Change? A Grounded Theory Analysis of Depressed Patients' Perspectives on Non-improvement in Psychotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00588 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Miléna De Smet, Reitske Meganck, Kimberly Van Nieuwenhove, Femke L. Truijens, Mattias Desmet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 40% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#13,179,163
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,873
of 31,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,260
of 352,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#342
of 730 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 730 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.