The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Expanded Evidence-Centered Design (e-ECD) for Learning and Assessment Systems: A Framework for Incorporating Learning Goals and Processes Within Assessment Design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00853 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meirav Arieli-Attali, Sue Ward, Jay Thomas, Benjamin Deonovic, Alina A. von Davier |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 17% |
| Psychology | 10 | 11% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,318,587
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,566
of 30,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,030
of 349,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#150
of 647 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 647 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.