↓ Skip to main content

Immersive Nature-Experiences as Health Promotion Interventions for Healthy, Vulnerable, and Sick Populations? A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Controlled Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
53 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immersive Nature-Experiences as Health Promotion Interventions for Healthy, Vulnerable, and Sick Populations? A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Controlled Studies
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00943
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lærke Mygind, Eva Kjeldsted, Rikke Dalgaard Hartmeyer, Erik Mygind, Mads Bølling, Peter Bentsen

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 239 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 85 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 9%
Sports and Recreations 18 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 98 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#909,522
of 26,130,653 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,936
of 35,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,835
of 366,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#53
of 641 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,130,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 641 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.