The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Weight Bias Internalization as an Embodied Process: Understanding How Obesity Stigma Gets Under the Skin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00953 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oli Williams, Ellen Annandale |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 24% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 41% |
| Scientists | 14 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#700,935
of 26,490,075 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,457
of 35,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,034
of 367,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#38
of 656 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,490,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 656 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.