The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Integrated Literature Review of Time-on-Task Effects With a Pragmatic Framework for Understanding and Improving Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Oncology Team Meetings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01245 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tayana Soukup, Benjamin W. Lamb, Matthias Weigl, James S. A. Green, Nick Sevdalis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Singapore | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,675,952
of 26,381,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,115
of 35,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,819
of 363,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#231
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.