The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How Do We Perceive “Aliens”? About the Implicit Processes Underlying the Perception of People With Alien Paraphernalia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01551 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nils Brandenstein, Fabian Gebauer, Claus-Christian Carbon |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Professor | 2 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 6 | 55% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,861,493
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,664
of 30,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,098
of 348,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#175
of 573 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 573 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.