The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Poor Quality in Systematic Reviews on PTSD and EMDR – An Examination of Search Methodology and Reporting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01558 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elin Opheim, Per Normann Andersen, Marianne Jakobsen, Bjørn Aasen, Kari Kvaal |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| Australia | 4 | 13% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Librarian | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,135,745
of 26,462,556 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,347
of 35,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,484
of 363,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#114
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,462,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.