↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Perceived Impact as the Underpinning Mechanism of the End-Spurt and U-Shape Pacing Patterns

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Perceived Impact as the Underpinning Mechanism of the End-Spurt and U-Shape Pacing Patterns
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aviv Emanuel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,574,742
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#24,661
of 30,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,673
of 346,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#541
of 583 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 583 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.