The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: The Natural World as a Resource for Learning and Development: From Schoolyards to Wilderness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01763 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ming Kuo, Catherine Jordan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 5 | 42% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 19% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,739,638
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,578
of 34,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,775
of 362,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#98
of 609 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 609 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.