↓ Skip to main content

The Dark Side of Expressed Humility for Non-humble Leaders: A Conservation of Resources Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Dark Side of Expressed Humility for Non-humble Leaders: A Conservation of Resources Perspective
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01858
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kejian Yang, Longzhi Zhou, Zhen Wang, Chen Lin, Zhengxue Luo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 35 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 14%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 36 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,727,347
of 24,744,050 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,494
of 33,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,969
of 347,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#80
of 602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,744,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.