↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Football Players Do Not Show “Neural Efficiency” in Cortical Activity Related to Visuospatial Information Processing During Football Scenes: An EEG Mapping Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Football Players Do Not Show “Neural Efficiency” in Cortical Activity Related to Visuospatial Information Processing During Football Scenes: An EEG Mapping Study
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01877
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Del Percio, Mauro Franzetti, Adelaide Josy De Matti, Giuseppe Noce, Roberta Lizio, Susanna Lopez, Andrea Soricelli, Raffaele Ferri, Maria Teresa Pascarelli, Marco Rizzo, Antonio Ivano Triggiani, Fabrizio Stocchi, Cristina Limatola, Claudio Babiloni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Sports and Recreations 3 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,578,452
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#24,669
of 30,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,135
of 340,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#523
of 597 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 597 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.