↓ Skip to main content

False-Positive Effect in the Radin Double-Slit Experiment on Observer Consciousness as Determined With the Advanced Meta-Experimental Protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
242 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
False-Positive Effect in the Radin Double-Slit Experiment on Observer Consciousness as Determined With the Advanced Meta-Experimental Protocol
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Walleczek, Nikolaus von Stillfried

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 242 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Philosophy 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#242,348
of 26,577,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#523
of 35,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,539
of 355,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#9
of 605 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,577,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 605 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.