You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Attacking Process in Football: A Taxonomy for Classifying How Teams Create Goal Scoring Opportunities Using a Case Study of Crystal Palace FC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02202 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jongwon Kim, Nic James, Nimai Parmar, Besim Ali, Goran Vučković |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 50% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Scientists | 8 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 3% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,028,224
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,013
of 31,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,418
of 355,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#98
of 600 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 600 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.