The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relationships Among Dietary Cognitive Restraint, Food Preferences, and Reaction Times
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02256 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Travis D. Masterson, John Brand, Michael R. Lowe, Stephen A. Metcalf, Ian W. Eisenberg, Jennifer A. Emond, Diane Gilbert-Diamond, Lisa A. Marsch |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,022,719
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,114
of 30,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,000
of 352,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#249
of 611 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 611 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.