The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Children’s Individual Differences in Executive Function and Theory of Mind in Relation to Prejudice Toward Social Minorities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02293 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ángela Hoyo, M. Rosario Rueda, Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Grenada | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 83% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,851,474
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,700
of 31,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,536
of 353,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#88
of 612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.