↓ Skip to main content

Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02309
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo Schames Kreitchmann, Francisco J. Abad, Vicente Ponsoda, Maria Dolores Nieto, Daniel Morillo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 342 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 17%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 7%
Researcher 16 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 49 14%
Unknown 139 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 19%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 3%
Other 71 21%
Unknown 142 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,548,947
of 26,320,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#14,693
of 35,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,538
of 371,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#321
of 606 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,320,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 606 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.