↓ Skip to main content

Deliberate Practice and Proposed Limits on the Effects of Practice on the Acquisition of Expert Performance: Why the Original Definition Matters and Recommendations for Future Research

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
173 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
310 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deliberate Practice and Proposed Limits on the Effects of Practice on the Acquisition of Expert Performance: Why the Original Definition Matters and Recommendations for Future Research
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02396
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Anders Ericsson, Kyle W. Harwell

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 173 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 310 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Researcher 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 115 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 10%
Sports and Recreations 28 9%
Social Sciences 19 6%
Arts and Humanities 12 4%
Other 57 18%
Unknown 126 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 238. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#169,810
of 26,552,644 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#365
of 35,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,370
of 380,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#8
of 621 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,552,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 621 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.