↓ Skip to main content

A Fair Share of Work: Is Fairness of Task Distribution a Mediator Between Transformational Leadership and Follower Emotional Exhaustion?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Fair Share of Work: Is Fairness of Task Distribution a Mediator Between Transformational Leadership and Follower Emotional Exhaustion?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02690
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tabea E. Scheel, Kathleen Otto, Tim Vahle-Hinz, Torsten Holstad, Thomas Rigotti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 15%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 16 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,704,083
of 24,818,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#14,282
of 33,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,988
of 471,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#307
of 571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,818,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.