↓ Skip to main content

Selecting Training-Load Measures to Explain Variability in Football Training Games

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selecting Training-Load Measures to Explain Variability in Football Training Games
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02897
Pubmed ID
Authors

Unai Zurutuza, Julen Castellano, Ibon Echeazarra, Ibai Guridi, David Casamichana

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 33 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 42 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Linguistics 1 1%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 38 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,392,249
of 25,890,819 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,936
of 34,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,809
of 478,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#288
of 603 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,890,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 603 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.