The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bizarreness of Lucid and Non-lucid Dream: Effects of Metacognition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02946 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chunyun Yu, Heyong Shen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 15% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,345,930
of 26,372,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,838
of 35,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,130
of 483,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#74
of 628 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 628 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.