↓ Skip to main content

Metacognitive Beliefs as Predictors of Return to Work After Intensive Return-to-Work Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Pain, Chronic Fatigue and Common Psychological Disorders: Results From a…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metacognitive Beliefs as Predictors of Return to Work After Intensive Return-to-Work Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Pain, Chronic Fatigue and Common Psychological Disorders: Results From a Prospective Trial
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henrik B. Jacobsen, Mari Glette, Karen W. Hara, Tore C. Stiles

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Lecturer 3 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 13 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Psychology 5 12%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 13 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,328,072
of 24,911,633 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,095
of 33,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,198
of 461,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#281
of 586 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,911,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 586 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.