↓ Skip to main content

What Are We Doing Wrong When Athletes Report Higher Levels of Fatigue From Traveling Than From Training or Competition?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Are We Doing Wrong When Athletes Report Higher Levels of Fatigue From Traveling Than From Training or Competition?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julio Calleja-Gonzalez, Diego Marques-Jimenez, Margaret Jones, Thomas Huyghe, Fernando Navarro, Anne Delextrat, Igor Jukic, Sergej M. Ostojic, Jaime E. Sampaio, Xavi Schelling, Pedro E. Alcaraz, Fernando Sanchez-Bañuelos, Xavier Leibar, Juan Mielgo-Ayuso, Nicolas Terrados

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 23 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 27 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,657,774
of 25,997,855 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,289
of 34,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,368
of 387,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#153
of 674 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,997,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 674 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.