The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Music Training, Working Memory, and Neural Oscillations: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00266 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate A. Yurgil, Miguel A. Velasquez, Jenna L. Winston, Noah B. Reichman, Paul J. Colombo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 181 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 73 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 80 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#14,476,769
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#15,441
of 30,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,838
of 361,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#415
of 672 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 672 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.