↓ Skip to main content

Approach to Resource Management and Physical Strength Predict Differences in Helping: Evidence From Two Small-Scale Societies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Approach to Resource Management and Physical Strength Predict Differences in Helping: Evidence From Two Small-Scale Societies
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00373
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Butovskaya, Michalina Marczak, Michał Misiak, Dmitry Karelin, Michał Białek, Piotr Sorokowski

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,944,925
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,244
of 30,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,187
of 368,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#379
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.