↓ Skip to main content

Factors Related to the Differential Development of Inter-Professional Collaboration Abilities in Medicine and Nursing Students

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors Related to the Differential Development of Inter-Professional Collaboration Abilities in Medicine and Nursing Students
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy Berduzco-Torres, Begonia Choquenaira-Callañaupa, Pamela Medina, Luis A. Chihuantito-Abal, Sdenka Caballero, Edo Gallegos, Montserrat San-Martín, Roberto C. Delgado Bolton, Luis Vivanco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 36 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Psychology 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 41 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,867,545
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,566
of 31,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,215
of 370,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#413
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.