↓ Skip to main content

Metacognition and Intersubjectivity: Reconsidering Their Relationship Following Advances From the Study of Persons With Psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metacognition and Intersubjectivity: Reconsidering Their Relationship Following Advances From the Study of Persons With Psychosis
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00567
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon, Andrew Gumley, Hamish McLeod, Paul H. Lysaker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 25 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Design 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 27 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,609,253
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,164
of 30,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,194
of 368,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#251
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.