↓ Skip to main content

A Framework for the Testing and Validation of Simulated Environments in Experimentation and Training

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Framework for the Testing and Validation of Simulated Environments in Experimentation and Training
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00605
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Harris, Jonathan M. Bird, Philip A. Smart, Mark R. Wilson, Samuel J. Vine

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 192 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Student > Master 20 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 81 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 11%
Computer Science 15 8%
Engineering 15 8%
Sports and Recreations 11 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 82 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,563,404
of 26,186,522 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,263
of 35,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,592
of 399,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#75
of 588 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,186,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 588 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.