The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Upside to Feeling Worse Than Average (WTA): A Conceptual Framework to Understand When, How, and for Whom WTA Beliefs Have Long-Term Benefits
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00642 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ashley V. Whillans, Alexander H. Jordan, Frances S. Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 6 | 18% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,144,560
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#14,258
of 34,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,245
of 401,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#310
of 569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.