↓ Skip to main content

Technologies for Cognitive Training and Cognitive Rehabilitation for People With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Technologies for Cognitive Training and Cognitive Rehabilitation for People With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. A Systematic Review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00648
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eider Irazoki, Leslie María Contreras-Somoza, José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán, Cristina Jenaro-Río, Henriëtte van der Roest, Manuel A. Franco-Martín

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Master 26 9%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 117 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Neuroscience 27 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 124 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,152,850
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,825
of 30,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,873
of 373,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#144
of 568 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 568 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.