↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive Models in Cybersecurity: Learning From Expert Analysts and Predicting Attacker Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive Models in Cybersecurity: Learning From Expert Analysts and Predicting Attacker Behavior
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vladislav D. Veksler, Norbou Buchler, Claire G. LaFleur, Michael S. Yu, Christian Lebiere, Cleotilde Gonzalez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 43 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 27 28%
Engineering 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 46 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,335,805
of 24,911,633 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,072
of 33,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,461
of 377,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#276
of 768 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,911,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 768 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.