↓ Skip to main content

Using Corpus Analyses to Help Address the DIF Interpretation: Gender Differences in Standardized Writing Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Corpus Analyses to Help Address the DIF Interpretation: Gender Differences in Standardized Writing Assessment
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi Li, Michelle Y. Chen, Jayanti Banerjee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 3 18%
Social Sciences 3 18%
Arts and Humanities 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#12,864,232
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,503
of 30,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,099
of 398,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#338
of 709 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 709 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.