↓ Skip to main content

The Effectiveness of Interventions for Developmental Dyslexia: Rhythmic Reading Training Compared With Hemisphere-Specific Stimulation and Action Video Games

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effectiveness of Interventions for Developmental Dyslexia: Rhythmic Reading Training Compared With Hemisphere-Specific Stimulation and Action Video Games
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice Cancer, Silvia Bonacina, Alessandro Antonietti, Antonio Salandi, Massimo Molteni, Maria Luisa Lorusso

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Student > Postgraduate 5 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 75 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 18%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Computer Science 5 3%
Linguistics 4 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 82 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,441,757
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,219
of 34,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,198
of 404,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#338
of 714 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 714 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.