↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Learning Methods on Spatial Knowledge Acquisition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Learning Methods on Spatial Knowledge Acquisition
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaohe Qiu, Lala Wen, Changxu Wu, Zhen Yang, Qijun Wang, Hongting Li, Duming Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Lecturer 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 20 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 13%
Computer Science 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Psychology 2 5%
Design 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 21 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#20,629,784
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#24,755
of 30,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,057
of 372,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#655
of 761 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 761 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.