The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Things That Go Bump in the Literature: An Environmental Appraisal of “Haunted Houses”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01328 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neil Dagnall, Kenneth G. Drinkwater, Ciarán O’Keeffe, Annalisa Ventola, Brian Laythe, Michael A. Jawer, Brandon Massullo, Giovanni B. Caputo, James Houran |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 43 | 28% |
| United States | 26 | 17% |
| Canada | 6 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Comoros | 2 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 71 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 119 | 76% |
| Scientists | 22 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#309,636
of 26,582,041 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#654
of 35,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,774
of 438,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#19
of 747 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,582,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 747 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.