↓ Skip to main content

Validity of Cognitive Tests for Non-human Animals: Pitfalls and Prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity of Cognitive Tests for Non-human Animals: Pitfalls and Prospects
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01835
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michèle N. Schubiger, Claudia Fichtel, Judith M. Burkart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 26%
Psychology 12 13%
Neuroscience 9 10%
Linguistics 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 33 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,523,966
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,891
of 34,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,798
of 426,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#292
of 783 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 783 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.