The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How Information on a Motive to Lie Influences CBCA-Based Ratings and Veracity Judgments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02021 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonas Schemmel, Tina Steinhagen, Matthias Ziegler, Renate Volbert |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Spain | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 56% |
Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 13 | 48% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,553,371
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,401
of 30,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,527
of 397,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#239
of 793 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 793 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.