The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Mitigating the Impact of the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic on Neuroscience and Music Research Protocols in Clinical Populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Efthymios Papatzikis, Fathima Zeba, Teppo Särkämö, Rafael Ramirez, Jennifer Grau-Sánchez, Mari Tervaniemi, Joanne Loewy |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,142,037
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,038
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,076
of 427,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#190
of 802 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 802 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.